All answers
How it works

How do I evaluate an introduction path with several intermediaries?

Evaluate a multi-step introduction path by checking every relationship, the relevance of the request and each intermediary's willingness. Shorter paths often involve less coordination, but length alone does not determine credibility. A graph can discover a possible chain; the chain becomes usable only through appropriate validation and participation at each step.
October 8, 2026

Validate each link

Record who knows whom, supporting evidence and what remains uncertain. An employee knowing an advisor does not prove that the advisor knows the buyer or would relay the request.

Explain the purpose consistently

Each intermediary should understand why the conversation may benefit the recipient. Avoid expanding the request into a broad favour or sharing confidential deal information unnecessarily.

Compare alternative routes

A longer confirmed route may be better than a short weak one. Direct relevant outreach may be preferable to several speculative requests. Research access and account context separately.

Track stages clearly

Distinguish proposed path, confirmed first link, next-person permission and final introduction delivered. Stop when a participant declines and avoid pressuring them to open another relationship.

Orbb can help research possible professional paths and coordinate appropriate requests. Ask how each link is evidenced and validated before treating a multi-step route as warm access to the buyer.

Related questions

Orbb researches the relationships your company already has — across customers, employees, investors and partners — then runs the introduction end to end, from finding the path to the meeting in the calendar.
See it on your own accounts