A pull-only tool requires a rep to remember it exists, at the moment they need it, and choose to open another tab. That happens in week one. By week six the tool is a line item nobody opens.
This is the commonest way a good product in this category dies. The data was fine; nobody looked at it.
| Event | Why it needs to interrupt someone |
|---|---|
| A champion changes employer | The window is the first ninety days and then it closes |
| A new path appears into an open deal | Someone just joined, or a colleague just met them |
| A stalled deal gains a second route | The reason the deal stalled may have just gone away |
| A target account becomes reachable | It was cold yesterday and is not today |
| A closed-lost account changes its buying committee | The person who said no has gone |
Each of these is an event your graph can see and a rep cannot.
Not in the tool. The useful destinations are the places people already are:
Orbb connects to Slack, Teams, Outreach, Salesforce and HubSpot, and exposes the graph through an MCP server so an assistant can be asked directly.
Push is harder to build and easier to get wrong. A product that is excellent at pull and honest about having little push is a reasonable purchase - if you pair it with a human process, such as a weekly review of new paths on open deals.
What does not work is buying a pull tool while expecting push behaviour, then concluding six months later that relationship intelligence does not work.