All answers
Tools and comparisons

Does relationship intelligence compete with LinkedIn Sales Navigator or layer on top of it?

It layers on top, and most teams keep both. Sales Navigator answers "who is connected to this person" from the network of whoever is logged in. Relationship intelligence answers "how well does anyone at my company know them, and who should ask" across every employee at once. The second question is the one that produces an introduction worth making.
October 2, 2026

What each one actually does

Sales NavigatorRelationship intelligence
Whose networkThe logged-in user'sThe whole company's
Connection strengthDegree only - 1st, 2nd, 3rdScored from real interaction
Data behind itLinkedIn connectionsEmail, calendar, CRM, calls, employment history
Tells you who should askNoYes, by name
Finds people nobody followsNoYes - former colleagues who never connected online
Also doesLead lists, InMail, saved searchesNothing like those

Why degree is not strength

A first-degree LinkedIn connection covers both a four-year colleague and someone who scanned a badge at a conference in 2016. The platform cannot tell them apart, because accepting a connection request is the only evidence it has.

That is the specific gap. Knowing that somebody is connected is nearly worthless when the next step is asking a colleague to spend social capital on an introduction. The question is which of eleven possible connections is strong enough that asking is reasonable.

The whole-company problem

Sales Navigator shows one person their own network. The relationship that opens a target account usually belongs to someone else entirely - an engineer, a founder, a CSM on a neighbouring account - and that person is not in the room when the rep is prospecting.

No seat-based LinkedIn tool solves this, because the data is partitioned by login. Relationship intelligence solves it by building one graph across everyone who connects their inbox.

Where the two overlap, and where they do not

Keep Sales Navigator for lead list building, saved searches, InMail, and seeing a person's current role and history.

Add relationship intelligence for deciding who at your company should make the ask, finding relationships that never existed on LinkedIn at all, and scoring whether a connection is worth spending.

The overlap is genuinely small, which is why "do I cancel one" almost never comes up after a trial.

The honest limitation

Relationship intelligence only sees relationships that generated a signal - an email thread, a meeting, a shared employer, a CRM record. A relationship that exists purely as a LinkedIn connection and nothing else is one it may rate as weak or miss entirely.

That is the correct behaviour. A connection with no interaction behind it is usually not a usable introduction. But it means the two tools see different things, and keeping both is a reasonable position rather than a sales answer.

Orbb finds the warm paths into your target accounts and names the colleague who can make the introduction.
See it on your own accounts